↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002113
Authors

Sharon Eustice, Brenda Roe, Jan Paterson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,917,114
of 21,338,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,671
of 12,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,373
of 419,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#153
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,338,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.