| Title |
Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002113 |
| Authors |
Sharon Eustice, Brenda Roe, Jan Paterson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,991
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,658
of 39,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.