↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine Huangqi type formulations for nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chinese herbal medicine Huangqi type formulations for nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006335.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mei Feng, Wei Yuan, Renzhong Zhang, Ping Fu, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Patients with primary nephrotic syndrome mostly need immunosuppression to achieve remission, but many of them either relapse after immunosuppression therapy or resistant to it. On the other hand, immunosuppression therapy could increase the adverse effect. Huangqi and Huangqi type formulations have been used to treat nephrotic syndrome for years in China, however the effects and safety of these formulations have not been systematically reviewed. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 36 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,695,441
of 22,039,250 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,411
of 12,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,923
of 176,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,039,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.