↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interval training exercise for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Interval training exercise for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012511
Authors

Maria Jose Oliveros, Monica C Gaete-Mahn, Fernando Lanas, Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Pamela Seron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Psychology 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2017.
All research outputs
#9,676,702
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,490
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,900
of 355,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.