↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Creatine for treating muscle disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Creatine for treating muscle disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004760.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudolf A Kley, Mark A Tarnopolsky, Matthias Vorgerd

Abstract

Progressive muscle weakness is a main symptom of most hereditary and acquired muscle diseases. Creatine improves muscle performance in healthy individuals. This is an update of our 2007 Cochrane review that evaluated creatine treatment in muscle disorders. Previous updates were in 2009 and 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 253 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 71 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 80 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#717,030
of 24,775,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,371
of 12,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,219
of 202,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,775,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.