Title |
Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted electrodes for urinary incontinence in men
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001202.pub5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bary Berghmans, Erik Hendriks, Arnold Bernards, Rob de Bie, Muhammad Imran Omar |
Abstract |
Electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices is used for patients with different types of urinary incontinence and symptoms of urgency, frequency and nocturia. The current review focused on electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices for the treatment of urinary incontinence in men. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 71 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
Psychology | 10 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,466
of 210,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#252
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.