↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for urinary incontinence in men

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for urinary incontinence in men
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001202.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bary Berghmans, Erik Hendriks, Arnold Bernards, Rob de Bie, Muhammad Imran Omar

Abstract

Electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices is used for patients with different types of urinary incontinence and symptoms of urgency, frequency and nocturia. The current review focused on electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices for the treatment of urinary incontinence in men.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 17%
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 19 11%
Other 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Psychology 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 46 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,273,442
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,777
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,229
of 197,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#253
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.