↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
68 tweeters
facebook
189 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006167.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smyth, Rebecca MD, Markham, Carolyn, Dowswell, Therese, Smyth, Rebecca M D, Rebecca MD Smyth, S Kate Alldred, Carolyn Markham

Abstract

Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 17%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 72 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 17%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 76 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#276,412
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#471
of 12,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,925
of 198,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.