The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015215.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel MacKeith, Caroline A Mulvaney, Kevin Galbraith, Katie E Webster, Rachel Connolly, Aye Paing, Tal Marom, Mat Daniel, Roderick P Venekamp, Maroeska M Rovers, Anne Gm Schilder |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,982,185
of 26,484,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,175
of 13,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,995
of 364,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,484,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.