↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Hartley, Nadine Flowers, Jennifer Holmes, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that both green and black tea are beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 389 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 18%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 95 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 113 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#74,726
of 21,732,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#451
of 174,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,732,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.