↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Hartley, Nadine Flowers, Jennifer Holmes, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that both green and black tea are beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 338 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 20%
Student > Bachelor 52 15%
Researcher 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 72 21%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 6%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 78 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#58,318
of 17,614,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 11,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#425
of 164,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,614,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.