| Title |
Concomitant hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced rectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006269.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle FM De Haas-Kock, Jeroen Buijsen, Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Ludy Lutgens, Guido Lammering, Ghislaine APG van Mastrigt, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Jacoba van der Zee |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 41% |
| Engineering | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,914,220
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,651
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,211
of 110,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.