| Title |
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piergiorgio Cao, Paola De Rango, Simona Zannetti, Giuseppe Giordano, Stefano Ricci, Maria Grazia Celani |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,354,303
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,618
of 13,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,275
of 39,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.