| Title |
Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004878.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo M Fernandes, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, Amy C Plint, Hema Patel, David W Johnson, Terry P Klassen, Lisa Hartling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 24% |
| Argentina | 3 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 10% |
| Chile | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 458 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 12% |
| Researcher | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 106 | 23% |
| Unknown | 127 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 144 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,323,382
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,782
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,715
of 213,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.