↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004878.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo M Fernandes, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, Amy C Plint, Hema Patel, David W Johnson, Terry P Klassen, Lisa Hartling

Abstract

Previous systematic reviews have not shown clear benefit of glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis, but their use remains considerable. Recent large trials add substantially to current evidence and suggest novel glucocorticoid-including treatment approaches.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 342 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Other 88 25%
Unknown 51 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 195 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 63 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#934,059
of 18,571,001 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,347
of 11,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,924
of 167,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,571,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.