The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta‐epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid Toews, Andrew Anglemyer, John Lz Nyirenda, Dima Alsaid, Sara Balduzzi, Kathrin Grummich, Lukas Schwingshackl, Lisa Bero |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 88 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 81% |
| Scientists | 12 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#812,347
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,421
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,781
of 390,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.