↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007281.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J Bath-Hextall, Rubeta N Matin, David Wilkinson, Jo Leonardi-Bee

Abstract

Bowen's disease is the clinical term for in situ squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Cutaneous lesions present as largely asymptomatic, well-defined, scaly erythematous patches on sun-exposed skin. In general, people with Bowen's disease have an excellent prognosis because the disease is typically slow-growing and responds favourably to treatment. Lesions are persistent and can be progressive, with a small potential (estimated to be 3%) to develop into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The relative effectiveness of the available treatments is not known for Bowen's disease, and this review attempts to address which is the most effective intervention, with the least side-effects, for cutaneous Bowen's disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 34 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,155,668
of 18,974,311 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,773
of 11,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,761
of 167,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,974,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.