The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003216.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gero Langer, Ching Shan Wan, Astrid Fink, Lukas Schwingshackl, Daniela Schoberer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,557,524
of 26,741,253 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,849
of 13,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,336
of 401,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.