↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005440.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Christopher Davidson, Christian Gluud, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Gallstones are present in about 10% to 15% of the adult western population. Between 1% and 4% of these adults become symptomatic in a year (the majority due to biliary colic but a significant proportion due to acute cholecystitis). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is mainly performed after the acute cholecystitis episode settles because of the fear of higher morbidity and of need for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. However, delaying surgery exposes the people to gallstone-related complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 322 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 18%
Student > Master 51 16%
Other 32 10%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 9%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 <1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 94 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,496,252
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,847
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,600
of 194,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.