↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Elective preterm birth for fetal gastroschisis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Elective preterm birth for fetal gastroschisis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009394.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie H Grant, Jon Dorling, Jim G Thornton

Abstract

Gastroschisis is an uncommon congenital defect of the anterior abdominal wall that results in herniation of intestinal loops outside the abdominal cavity. Babies with gastroschisis generally do well, but there remains a mortality rate of 5% to 10% and some require prolonged parenteral nutrition and intensive care. Significant injury to the exposed bowel may occur in-utero, and earlier birth may reduce this, improve long-term outcomes and reduce complications, such as necrotising enterocolitis. However, it may also increase complications related to prematurity. There is a lack of published data in this area.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 42 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#5,965,887
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,779
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,410
of 197,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#181
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.