↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003418.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex N Goudswaard, Niall J Furlong, Gerlof D Valk, Ronald P Stolk, Guy EHM Rutten

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,688,319
of 20,568,640 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,631
of 12,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,531
of 385,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,568,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.