↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003418.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex N Goudswaard, Niall J Furlong, Gerlof D Valk, Ronald P Stolk, Guy EHM Rutten

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 25 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,146,630
of 18,917,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,385
of 11,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,036
of 374,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,917,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.