↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003287.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Siebenhofer, Johannes Plank, Andrea Berghold, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Markus Narath, Robert Gfrerer, Thomas R Pieber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 218 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 21%
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 18 8%
Other 48 21%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 37 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,998,911
of 17,455,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,657
of 11,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,761
of 366,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,455,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.