The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003287.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Siebenhofer, Johannes Plank, Andrea Berghold, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Markus Narath, Robert Gfrerer, Thomas R Pieber |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 291 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 21% |
| Unknown | 75 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#3,469,078
of 26,493,631 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,067
of 13,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,088
of 88,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.