| Title |
Anthracycline‐containing regimens for treatment of follicular lymphoma in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008909.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gilad Itchaki, Anat Gafter‐Gvili, Meir Lahav, Liat Vidal, Pia Raanani, Ofer Shpilberg, Mical Paul |
| Abstract |
Anthracycline-containing regimens (ACR) are the most prevalent regimens in the management of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). However, there is no proof that they are superior to non-anthracycline-containing regimens (non-ACR). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,811,404
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,625
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,334
of 206,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#226
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.