The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Interventions for the management of mandibular fractures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006087.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mona Nasser, Nikolaos Pandis, Padhraig S Fleming, Zbys Fedorowicz, Edward Ellis, Kamran Ali |
Abstract |
Fractures of the mandible (lower jaw) are a common occurrence and usually related to interpersonal violence or road traffic accidents. Mandibular fractures may be treated using open (surgical) and closed (non-surgical) techniques. Fracture sites are immobilized with intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or other external or internal devices (i.e. plates and screws) to allow bone healing. Various techniques have been used, however uncertainty exists with respect to the specific indications for each approach. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
Bahrain | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 31% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 446 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 75 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 8% |
Researcher | 29 | 6% |
Other | 84 | 19% |
Unknown | 136 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 216 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 6% |
Psychology | 10 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
Other | 33 | 7% |
Unknown | 151 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,526,296
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,102
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,365
of 207,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.