↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antiplatelet and anticoagulation for patients with prosthetic heart valves

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Antiplatelet and anticoagulation for patients with prosthetic heart valves
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003464.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Massel, Stephen H Little

Abstract

Patients with prosthetic heart valves are at increased risk for valve thrombosis and arterial thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulation alone, or the addition of antiplatelet drugs, has been used to minimise this risk. An important issue is the effectiveness and safety of the latter strategy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 35 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,360,186
of 19,069,422 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,361
of 11,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,920
of 168,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,069,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.