The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection outside of healthcare settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015112.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandru Marian Constantin, Kukuh Noertjojo, Isolde Sommer, Ana Beatriz Pizarro, Emma Persad, Solange Durao, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Damien M McElvenny, Sarah Rhodes, Craig Martin, Olivia Sampson, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Matteo Bruschettini |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,875,381
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,424
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,242
of 346,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.