↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005545.pub3
Authors

Franz Majoko, Glenn Gardener

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 28%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#5,606,755
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,425
of 365,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.