↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐invasive high‐frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Non‐invasive high‐frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012712.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed E Abdel-Latif, Olive Tan, Michelle Fiander, David A Osborn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,714,761
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,764
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,740
of 334,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.