The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Daratumumab and antineoplastic therapy versus antineoplastic therapy only for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013595.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Langer, Lukas John, Ina Monsef, Christof Scheid, Vanessa Piechotta, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,295,216
of 26,251,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,674
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,341
of 342,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,251,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.