The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011670.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiyi Zhou, Yao Cheng, Nansheng Cheng, Jianping Gong, Bing Tu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 34% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,928,419
of 26,503,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,364
of 13,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,422
of 339,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.