The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004661.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily S Shepherd, Shona Goldsmith, Lex W Doyle, Philippa Middleton, Stéphane Marret, Dwight J Rouse, Peter Pryde, Hanne T Wolf, Caroline A Crowther |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 18% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 29% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#568,355
of 26,705,860 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#933
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,037
of 339,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,705,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.