↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parallel use of low‐complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assays to detect tuberculosis disease in adults and adolescents living with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Parallel use of low‐complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assays to detect tuberculosis disease in adults and adolescents living with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd016070
Authors

Stephanie Bjerrum, Bada Yang, Johanna Åhsberg, Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana, Laura Olbrich, Devan Jaganath, Alexander W Kay, Andreas Lundh, Maunank Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Environmental Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,623,012
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,266
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,262
of 306,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.