↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004170.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Turner-Stokes, Lynne, Nair, Ajoy, Sedki, Imad, Disler, Peter B, Wade, Derick T, Turner-Stokes, L, Disler, P B, Nair, A, Wade, D T

Abstract

Evidence from systematic reviews demonstrates that multi-disciplinary rehabilitation is effective in the stroke population, where older adults predominate. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of rehabilitation following acquired brain injury (ABI) in younger adults is not yet established, perhaps because there are different methodological challenges.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 37 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 28%
Psychology 38 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Social Sciences 24 10%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 45 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,864,050
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,356
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,501
of 165,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.