Report for: Group versus conventional antenatal care for women

Title	Group versus conventional antenatal care for women
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd007622.pub3
Pubmed ID	25649049
Authors	Christine J Catling, Nancy Medley, Maralyn Foureur, Clare Ryan, Nicky Leap, Alison Teate, Caroline SE Homer

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	1	100%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	1	100%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	3	<1%
Tanzania, United Republic of	1	<1%
South Africa	1	<1%
Ethiopia	1	<1%
Canada	1	<1%
Mexico	1	<1%
Unknown	617	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	127	20%
Student > Bachelor	79	13%
Researcher	72	12%
Student > Ph. D. Student	59	9%
Student > Doctoral Student	36	6%
Other	107	17%
Unknown	145	23%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	185	30%
Nursing and Health Professions	117	19%
Social Sciences	48	8%
Psychology	41	7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	14	2%
Other	55	9%
Unknown	165	26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.

All research outputs

#2,963,288

of 22,953,506 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#5,675

of 12,333 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#44,502

of 353,188 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#128

of 270 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Group versus conventional antenatal care for women

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context