↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for term neonates with respiratory distress

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for term neonates with respiratory distress
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011962
Authors

Jann P Foster, Adam Buckmaster, Lynn Sinclair, Sylvia Lees, Robert Guaran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Librarian 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,531,724
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,452
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,333
of 386,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#257
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.