↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shona Charlton, Allan M Cyna, Philippa Middleton, James D Griffiths

Abstract

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block which anaesthetises the abdominal wall. The increasing use of TAP block, as a form of pain relief after abdominal surgery warrants evaluation of its effectiveness as an adjunctive technique to routine care and, when compared with other analgesic techniques.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 37 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,596,683
of 16,479,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,744
of 11,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,628
of 161,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,479,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.