↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
770 Mendeley
Title
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Clement, Francesca Lassman, Elizabeth Barley, Sara Evans-Lacko, Paul Williams, Sosei Yamaguchi, Mike Slade, Nicolas Rüsch, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

Mental health-related stigma is widespread and has major adverse effects on the lives of people with mental health problems. Its two major components are discrimination (being treated unfairly) and prejudice (stigmatising attitudes). Anti-stigma initiatives often include mass media interventions, and such interventions can be expensive. It is important to know if mass media interventions are effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 770 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 751 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 157 20%
Researcher 113 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 13%
Student > Bachelor 92 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 7%
Other 126 16%
Unknown 125 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 158 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 150 19%
Social Sciences 105 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Other 94 12%
Unknown 161 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#612,409
of 18,780,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,427
of 11,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,891
of 170,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,780,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.