↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1009 Mendeley
Title
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Clement, Francesca Lassman, Elizabeth Barley, Sara Evans‐Lacko, Paul Williams, Sosei Yamaguchi, Mike Slade, Nicolas Rüsch, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

Mental health-related stigma is widespread and has major adverse effects on the lives of people with mental health problems. Its two major components are discrimination (being treated unfairly) and prejudice (stigmatising attitudes). Anti-stigma initiatives often include mass media interventions, and such interventions can be expensive. It is important to know if mass media interventions are effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,009 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 990 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 175 17%
Researcher 123 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 12%
Student > Bachelor 111 11%
Student > Postgraduate 55 5%
Other 170 17%
Unknown 254 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 180 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 171 17%
Social Sciences 117 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 2%
Other 118 12%
Unknown 296 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#761,199
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,420
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,967
of 209,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.