↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Debridement for surgical wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Debridement for surgical wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006214.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Smith, Jayne Donaldson, Tamara Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,337,151
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,381
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,150
of 328,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.