↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
6 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J Kelly, Josephine Kavanagh, Jane Thomas

Abstract

Castor oil, a potent cathartic, is derived from the bean of the castor plant. Anecdotal reports, which date back to ancient Egypt have suggested the use of castor oil to stimulate labour. Castor oil has been widely used as a traditional method of initiating labour in midwifery practice. Its role in the initiation of labour is poorly understood and data examining its efficacy within a clinical trial are limited. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 8 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 29 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#784,090
of 18,011,329 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,966
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,915
of 168,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,011,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.