↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J Kelly, Josephine Kavanagh, Jane Thomas

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 14 7%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 62 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 68 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#761,311
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,314
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,627
of 211,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.