↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009017.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Gholitabar, Hugh McGuire, Janet Rennie, Donal Manning, Rosalind Lai

Abstract

There are many pathological conditions leading to an elevated unconjugated bilirubin level (hyperbilirubinaemia) in neonates. Currently the standard therapies for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia include phototherapy and exchange transfusion. In addition to phototherapy, clofibrate has been studied as a treatment for hyperbilirubinaemia in several countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,957,060
of 22,173,707 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,812
of 12,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,541
of 177,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,173,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.