↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antithrombotic therapy for improving maternal or infant health outcomes in women considered at risk of placental dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Antithrombotic therapy for improving maternal or infant health outcomes in women considered at risk of placental dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006780.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Anne McLeod, Rory C Windrim, John Kingdom

Abstract

Pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and placental abruption are thought to have a common origin related to abnormalities in the development and function of the placenta.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 201 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 51 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,078
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,066
of 197,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.