↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003106.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Churchill, Lelia Duley, Jim G Thornton, Leanne Jones

Abstract

Severe pre-eclampsia can cause significant mortality and morbidity for both mother and child, particularly when it occurs remote from term, between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. The only known cure for this disease is delivery. Some obstetricians advocate early delivery to ensure that the development of serious maternal complications, such as eclampsia (fits) and kidney failure are prevented. Others prefer a more expectant approach delaying delivery in an attempt to reduce the mortality and morbidity for the child associated with being born too early.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 19 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,374,059
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,466
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,373
of 210,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#173
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.