↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003106.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Churchill, Lelia Duley, Jim G Thornton, Leanne Jones

Abstract

Severe pre-eclampsia can cause significant mortality and morbidity for both mother and child, particularly when it occurs remote from term, between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. The only known cure for this disease is delivery. Some obstetricians advocate early delivery to ensure that the development of serious maternal complications, such as eclampsia (fits) and kidney failure are prevented. Others prefer a more expectant approach delaying delivery in an attempt to reduce the mortality and morbidity for the child associated with being born too early.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 14 8%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,633,991
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,555
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,748
of 199,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.