↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Danshen (Chinese medicinal herb) preparations for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Danshen (Chinese medicinal herb) preparations for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004465.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taixiang Wu, Juan Ni, Jiafu Wei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,932,082
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,729
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,076
of 67,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.