The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Treatment of dental complications in sickle cell disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011633.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priti Mulimani, Samir K Ballas, Adinegara Bl Abas, Laxminarayan Karanth |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 104 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,148,043
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,302
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,986
of 486,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.