↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercises for the prevention of non‐specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Exercises for the prevention of non‐specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Ps Scaff, Mark J Hancock, Tatiane da Silva Munhoz, Christopher G Maher, Bruno T Saragiotto

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,474,174
of 26,726,803 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,771
of 13,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,419
of 297,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,726,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.