↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006944.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania M Winzenberg, Sandi Powell, Kelly A Shaw, Graeme Jones

Abstract

Results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation to improve bone density in children are inconsistent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 21%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 38 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#528,824
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,261
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,340
of 166,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.