↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for improving bone mineral density in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006944.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania M Winzenberg, Sandi Powell, Kelly A Shaw, Graeme Jones

Abstract

Results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation to improve bone density in children are inconsistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 73 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#777,318
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,467
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,179
of 108,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.