↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002096.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Moayyedi, Shelly Soo, Jonathan J Deeks, Brendan Delaney, Adam Harris, Michael Innes, R Oakes, Sue Wilson, A Roalfe, Cathy Bennett, David Forman

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 17 29%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 48%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,342,133
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,426
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,373
of 105,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.