↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002096.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Moayyedi, Shelly Soo, Jonathan J Deeks, Brendan Delaney, Adam Harris, Michael Innes, R Oakes, Sue Wilson, A Roalfe, Cathy Bennett, David Forman

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#10,023,986
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,324
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,631
of 151,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.