↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004795.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilia E Ziganshina, Albina F Titarenko, Geraint R Davies

Abstract

Currently the World Health Organization only recommend fluoroquinolones for people with presumed drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) who cannot take standard first-line drugs. However, use of fluoroquinolones could shorten the length of treatment and improve other outcomes in these people. This review summarises the effects of fluoroquinolones in first-line regimens in people with presumed drug-sensitive TB.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 52 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,839,765
of 17,444,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,477
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,018
of 165,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,444,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.