↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004795.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilia E Ziganshina, Albina F Titarenko, Geraint R Davies

Abstract

Currently the World Health Organization only recommend fluoroquinolones for people with presumed drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) who cannot take standard first-line drugs. However, use of fluoroquinolones could shorten the length of treatment and improve other outcomes in these people. This review summarises the effects of fluoroquinolones in first-line regimens in people with presumed drug-sensitive TB.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 277 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 68 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 75 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,877,102
of 22,150,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,340
of 12,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,353
of 176,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,150,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.