↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Neuraxial anaesthesia for lower-limb revascularization

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Neuraxial anaesthesia for lower-limb revascularization
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007083.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiano T Barbosa, Mário J Jucá, Aldemar A Castro, Jairo C Cavalcante

Abstract

Lower-limb revascularization is a surgical procedure that is performed to restore an adequate blood supply to the limbs. Lower-limb revascularization surgery is used to reduce pain and sometimes to improve lower-limb function. Neuraxial anaesthesia is an anaesthetic technique that uses local anaesthetics next to the spinal cord to block nerve function. Neuraxial anaesthesia may lead to improved survival. This systematic review was originally published in 2010 and was first updated in 2011 and again in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 17 10%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 47 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,403,299
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,839
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,094
of 152,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.