| Title |
Psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents who have been sexually abused
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008162.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Parker, William Turner |
| Abstract |
The sexual abuse of children and adolescents is a significant worldwide problem. It is associated with a wide variety of negative psychological, social and physical consequences for the victims. These effects can often be seen immediately following sexual abuse, but they may manifest later on and sometimes only in adult life. There are a number of different interventions aimed at helping children and adolescents who have been sexually abused, and psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy has a long-established tradition of being used for such victims. In this review, we set out to find the evidence for its effectiveness specifically in children and adolescents who have been sexually abused. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 95 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,026,763
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,280
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,923
of 210,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.