↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for intermittent exotropia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for intermittent exotropia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003737.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R Hatt, Lawrence Gnanaraj

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 13 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,608,529
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,347
of 268,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#189
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.