↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001139.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pennick V, Liddle SD, Pennick, Victoria, Liddle, Sarah D

Abstract

More than two-thirds of pregnant women experience low-back pain (LBP) and almost one-fifth experience pelvic pain. Pain increases with advancing pregnancy and interferes with work, daily activities and sleep.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 442 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 23%
Student > Bachelor 84 18%
Researcher 36 8%
Student > Postgraduate 34 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 113 25%
Unknown 53 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 96 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 5%
Sports and Recreations 20 4%
Psychology 14 3%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 72 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#729,345
of 17,475,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,853
of 11,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,511
of 166,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,475,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.