| Title |
Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007097.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lona Jawaheer, Caroline J MacEwen, Deepa Anijeet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,994,598
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,885
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,867
of 325,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.