↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
57 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004147.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Simona Vecchi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 71 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 29%
Psychology 35 14%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 81 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#556,754
of 21,961,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,134
of 12,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,861
of 278,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,961,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.